If @realDonaldTrump is EXCHEQUER of the Vatican bank, wouldn't that make him "Holy See" while the seat is vacant?
- DonnaLeung
- 5月4日
- 讀畢需時 2 分鐘
If You’re Worried About the Market, This Will Put Your Mind at Ease. Remember Trump’s 2017 Tour?
Hint:
Q 1950
U.S.-👉HOLY SEE RELATIONS
👉"The Holy See is the universal government of the Catholic Church and operates from👉Vatican City State, a sovereign, independent territory. The Pope is the ruler of both Vatican City State and the👉Holy See.👉The Holy See, as the supreme body of government of th👉 Catholic Church, is a sovereign juridical entity under international law."
Wealth?
Power?
Sanctuary against criminal prosecution?
Recipe for …….
Q
If @realDonaldTrump is EXCHEQUER of the Vatican bank, wouldn't that make him "Holy See" while the seat is vacant?
2017 Capitulation Tour
Bank of London/Vatican BANK/Federal Reserve all capitulated to Trump, and he became Exchequer.
Vatican Bank-
Founded in 1942, it handles the Church’s wealth and its global financial arms. Whoever controls the bank holds practical leverage over cardinals, dioceses, and international reach.
The Holy See is the jurisdiction of the Pope and encompasses the Church’s central governance.
During sede vacante (vacant seat), the Camerlengo administers the Vatican’s temporal goods, but has no authority over doctrine or Church direction.
But canon law presumes no foreign power controls the Vatican Bank. If a non-cardinal (like Trump) seized that power through legal, military, or economic means, canon law is nullified in practice.
If Trump holds Exchequer powers, he may de facto override the current Camerlengo, who happens to be and American, (Kevin Ferrell 🇺🇸) in managing assets, effectively controlling the “body” while the “soul” (papacy) is absent.
HE WHO CONTROLS THE GOLD
What powers would he have as "interim pope"?
Canon Law does not allow for a non-cardinal or non-cleric to assume any papal functions. BUT extra-canonically—in a scenario of total collapse or exposure of corruption—it’s possible a financial steward could step into power de facto, especially if he’s seen as a purifier or restorer.
Could he disband the conclave selection process?Could he reinstate excommunicated Vigano? Could he replace the selection process so the people have a voice?
Disband the conclave?
Only by force or through an exposed illegitimacy (e.g., blackmail, deep state infiltration).
Reinstate Vigano?
Yes—if he becomes pope or overrides the Vatican administration via financial or public support.
Reform the selection process?
In theory—if a new constitution is imposed (perhaps mirroring Christendom's original pre-papal model).
What remains of the "Church"?
If the institution is hijacked or corrupted, only the faithful and the Word remain. In this scenario, Trump might symbolize a cleansing force—a temporal agent preparing the Church for rebirth, possibly handing it back to the people or God’s anointed.
But Trump isn’t a cardinal or bishop?!?
Canonically invalid—he’s not a bishop, cardinal, or cleric. BUT: If the Church is proven infiltrated or illegitimate (e.g., via corruption or Satanic compromise), then spiritual leadership could revert to a Davidic figure chosen by the people or by providence.
Conclusion: If the Bank of London, Federal Reserve, and Vatican Bank “capitulated” to Trump in 2017, this makes him, symbolically, King of the Financial Axis—reviving the Three Crowns of the papal tiara: Spiritual supremacy, Temporal kingship, and Judicial authority over kings/nations. (Remember the SA sword dance? Forbidden City? DMZ NK?)
Truth:@mnisahellhole
Commentaires